Due to the collective action dilemma stated above, individual fishers are recommended to implement a variety of countermeasures to safeguard their financial interests while decreasing the likelihood of overfishing (Granovetter, 2017). They will likely make a loose pact with other fishermen on maintaining healthy fish populations. For example, they could agree to limit the number of times they go fishing together or the number of fish they bring home each time. This prevents overfishing and allows fishermen to maximize their profits.
Second, the fishermen may form a coalition to control lake fishing. For example, the lake’s fishing laws could be instituted along the lines of a quota system. By doing so, they may prevent overfishing without reducing their financial gains (Katare, 2021). In addition, the aforementioned incentives will inspire fishermen to make the most of the fishing season by spending as much time as possible on the water (Muñoz & Cohen, 2018). Further, the fishermen will be urged to employ sustainable fishing practices to preserve the fish population, given that they are aware that the population will not be able to reproduce if it falls below a threshold size If you need a similar paper visit Term Paper.
Non-economic incentives
Besides economic incentives, numerous other factors may influence small-scale fishers’ judgments on how often they take their boats out throughout the fishing season. It’s possible that social and cultural elements have a pivotal role (Chien et al., 2022). For example, the fishermen may have always taken time off during the harvest season or only fished on specific days of the year. Even if fishermen are cognizant of the potential effects of their actions on the fish population, they may be swayed by long-standing traditions.
The fishermen may feel a common need to protect their area’s natural resources. As a result, they may become more restrained in their fishing practices to protect fish stocks from overexploitation (Ito et al., 2018). There’s also the chance that they want to leave the fishing world in better shape for future generations. Connections with neighbors and friends may also have an impact on the fishermen. If the fishing village community is close-knit, the fishermen may look out for the collective good rather than for themselves alone. When everyone’s livelihood is tied to the same fish pool, it stands to reason that the fishermen will make decisions as a group rather than look out for themselves individually If you need to travel to Africa, visit Reisen Safari Kenya.
In addition to making a living, the fishermen may strongly desire to support their families. When someone is the sole provider for their family, they may feel more pressure to catch enough fish each season to feed everyone (Floress et al., 2017). As an added complication, fishermen may feel pressured to maximize their catch if the fish they sell for a low price. Lastly, the fishermen might be impacted by the other fishermen in the vicinity. If there are many fishermen in the area, competition for fish may be fierce, prompting some to increase their fishing efforts to get a larger haul. On the other hand, if there aren’t many fishermen around, competition won’t be as fierce, and fishermen will likely be more cautious.
Ultimately, economic incentives are not the only factor that may influence small-scale fishers’ choices about the number of days they spend actively fishing during the fishing season (Chien et al., 2022). The presence of other fishermen in the area, as well as social and cultural factors, a shared sense of responsibility towards the local environment, relationships with other members of the community, the need to provide for one’s family, and the presence of other fishers, are all likely to influence the decisions of the fishers.